Παρασκευή, Σεπτεμβρίου 02, 2011

WIKILEAKS GREEK CABLEGATE:ΟΙ ΗΠΑ ΔΕΝ ΠΗΡΑΝ ΠΟΤΕ ΣΤΑ ΣΟΒΑΡΑ ΤΙΣ ΑΝΤΙΠΟΛΙΤΕΥΤΙΚΕΣ ΚΟΡΩΝΕΣ ΓΑΠ ΓΙΑ ΤΑ 12 ΜΙΛΙΑ ΚΑΙ ΤΑ ΕΛΛΗΝΟΤΟΥΡΚΙΚΑ!!!

Άλλωστε και ο Δρούτσας, εμμέσως πλην σαφώς, τους το επιβεβαίωσε...  


 GREECE-TURKEY AEGEAN DISPUTES: A SHORT  
  C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ATHENS 001475 



SIPDIS 


SIPDIS 


FOR EUR, EUR/SE 


E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/07/2016 
TAGS: PREL, PGOV, TU, GR 
SUBJECT: GREECE-TURKEY AEGEAN DISPUTES: A SHORT 
RETROSPECTIVE ON THE ICJ OPTION 


REF: A. ATHENS 1450 
B. ATHENS 1405 AND PREVIOUS 


Classified By: CDA TOM COUNTRYMAN FOR REASONS 1.4(B) AND (D) 


1. (C) SUMMARY: In the wake of the May 23 midair collision 
between Greek and Turkish fighters, statements by former 
President Stephanopoulos to refer all Greek-Turkish Aegean 
disputes to the ICJ caused a mini uproar here (ref B), but 
actually represent nothing new. Over the years, Greek 
government interest in going to the ICJ has waxed and waned, 
depending on the ebb and flow of relations with Turkey. A 
high point was reached in 1975, when both Greece and Turkey 
agreed to refer the continental shelf issue, but nothing came 
of it when Turkey subsequently balked. As part of his 
rapprochement policy, former FM Papandreou got the EU Council 
to bless Turkey's EU candidacy during the 1999 Helsinki EU 
Summit, with language that the Council would refer any 
outstanding differences to the ICJ by the end of 2004. With 
the advent of the cautious Karamanlis government in March 
2004, however, neither side has made much effort to implement 
this so-called "Helsinki process." If the ICJ option has any 
utility for the GoG, it is in deflecting negative 
media/public opinion away from its failure to make any 
substantive headway in the on-going, but moribund Aegean 
exploratory talks with Turkey. This costs the GoG little, 
since FM Bakoyannis recently told us that PM Erdogan was 
"very far away" from discussing the ICJ (ref A). END SUMMARY. 


2. (U) Former President Costis Stephanopoulos, who recently 
triggered a mini uproar in the media by proposing that Greece 
resolve all of its Aegean disputes with Turkey by referring 
them to the International Court of Justice at The Hague (ref 
B), published a follow-up to his original proposal on June 4. 
He maintained that, given the impasse in Greek-Turkish 
relations, and incidents like the May 23 mid-air collision of 
Greek and Turkish fighter jets, which resulted in the death 
of the Greek pilot, Greece must break with its diplomatic 
tradition and seek a solution through an international 
judicial verdict. Otherwise, he argued, the situation in the 
Aegean stands to deteriorate further, with the possibility of 
war increasing accordingly. Stephanopoulos also said Greece 
should enlist the support of EU and non-European countries to 
pressure Turkey into accepting the ICJ referral. 


3. (U) The idea of referring Greek-Turkish Aegean disputes 
to the ICJ is not new. Since the 1974 Turkish invasion of 
Cyprus, Greek governments have had bouts of "Hague proposals" 
depending on crises and the ebb and flow of relations with 
Turkey. In 1975, Turkey agreed to the referral of the 
continental shelf dispute to the ICJ, announced in a joint 
statement by then PM Karamanlis (the uncle of the current PM) 
and PM Demirel in Brussels, but subsequently backpedaled, 
insisting instead on bilateral dialogue to find a "political" 
solution to the dispute -- a position it has maintained, with 
little change since that time. Greek politicians and 
diplomats, however, have remained divided over the wisdom of 
going to The Hague, even for the sole question of the 
continental shelf, which Greece continues to claim is the 
only outstanding issue between Athens and Ankara in the 
Aegean that is not clearly settled in international law. 


4. (SBU) The option of going to the ICJ remained in limbo 
until the Imia/Kardak crisis of January 1996. With Turkish 
commandos occupying the larger of the two Imia rocks for 
several hours, U.S. diplomatic intervention defused the 
situation by getting Greece and Turkey to agree on a 
disengagement formula of "no flags, no ships, no troops." 
Within months of the crisis, which narrowly avoided a 
shooting war, Turkey was promoting the theory of "grey zones" 
in the Aegean and Greek PM Simitis was inaugurating a 
"step-by-step" approach to Greek-Turkish relations 
suggesting, among other things, the eventual referral of the 
continental shelf question to the ICJ. (Note: According to 
Turkey, Aegean "grey zones" encompass islets and rocks not 
specifically turned over to Greece by international treaty 
and, therefore, of disputed sovereignty) End Note). 


5. (SBU) During the eight years between 1996 and 2004, 
Greek FM George Papandreou charted a major change of 
direction in Greek-Turkish relations. He lifted Greece's 
objections to Turkey's EU aspirations and energetically 
supported Ankara's bid for EU candidate status, a target 
achieved at the Helsinki EU Summit (December 1999), when the 
EU officially accepted this status. As part of a 
pre-accession phase that started at Helsinki, Turkey was 
expected to contribute to the peaceful resolution of Cyprus 
and Aegean issues and pursue good neighborly relations with 
Greece. In fact, the summit conclusions provided that the 


ATHENS 00001475 002 OF 002 




European Council would review the course of Greek-Turkish 
relations at the end of 2004 and recommend the referral of 
any outstanding differences to the ICJ. 


6. (SBU) This "Helsinki process," widely identified as the 
brain child of George Papandreou -- who insisted that 
"Europeanizing" Turkey was the best means to achieve good 
bilateral relations -- never truly took root, as neither 
Greece nor Turkey displayed much appetite to work on it. 
Thus, at the end of 2004, with Greece now under the cautious 
governance of PM Karamanlis, the European Council had little 
to review concerning Greek-Turkish relations, and thoughts 
about the ICJ were again shelved. Papandreou and his PASOK 
party have since charged the Karamanlis government of 
deliberately abandoning the Helsinki process and scuttling 
the only way of improving Greek-Turkish relations. 


7. (SBU) The Stephanopoulos proposal, coming as it did only 
days before a June 9-10 trip to Istanbul by FM Dora 
Bakoyannis, has re-ignited the ICJ debate with a passion, 
with many, including Defense Minister Meimarakis, warning 
that the country's sovereign rights cannot be subject to a 
juridical process. PM Karamanlis, after a meeting with 
former FM Molyviatis, an avowed skeptic concerning the ICJ, 
has re-affirmed Greece's old position that the international 
tribunal could be an arbitration platform solely on the 
question of the continental shelf. 


8. (C) Others, including opposition PASOK leader George 
Papandreou and many leftwing parliamentarians, warmly 
endorsed the proposal. Papandreou, who met June 7 with PM 
Karamanlis to discuss Aegean issues, was reported as 
supporting the extension of Greece's territorial waters under 
international treaty before Greece and Turkey made any 
decision to involve the ICJ. Asked June 7 if Papandreou was 
advocated extending Greek territorial seas to the 12-mile 
limit as provided in the Law of the Sea treaty, Papandreou 
foreign policy adviser Dimitris Droutsas played down the 
remarks to us, saying Papandreou had never mentioned any 
specific figure and that PASOK policy had not changed. 
(Comment: Most media interpreted Papandreou's remarks as 
extending these waters to the 12-mile limit -- a move which 
would likely provoke a sharp Turkish reaction (the Turkish 
Parliament still formally regards any such extension as a 
"casus belli"). Governing New Democracy politicians and the 
pro-ND media castigated Papandreou for irresponsibility. 
They argued that during his eight years as FM, he never 
advocated such an extreme position. Our take is that 
Papandreou, aware of his anemic standing in the polls and 
within his party, did so to bolster his position by appearing 
tough on Turkey. End Note.) 


9. (C) COMMENT: Even in the unlikely event the GoG 
embraced Stephanopoulos' proposal to refer all outstanding 
Aegean disputes to the ICJ, the GoG believes that Turkey 
would not go along. FM Bakoyannis said as much to Ambassador 
at a June 5 meeting (ref A). At this point, the only utility 
for the GoG we see in the ICJ option is a means to deflect 
negative media/public attention away from its failure to 
produce anything substantive in the on-going Aegean 
exploratory talks (now in their 33rd round), compounded by 
the recent midair accident. 
COUNTRYMAN 


http://www.thepressproject.gr/searchlabdetails.php?type=wiki&ref=06ATHENS1475


ΠΡΕΖΑ TV
2-9-2011

Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια: